Alternative York

Gordon ‘Fagin’ Brown, in a withering and desperate attempt to avoid huge Labour losses and a humiliation in this Thursday’s local elections, today apologised for his huge 10p tax blunder. The bungling PM, when asked if he regretted the decision to abolish the 10p tax rate for the lowest earners said “Of course, because it’s unfortunate when things go wrong for people and we’ve tried to sort that out immediately over the last few days.”

The bad thing is for Gordon, the electorate don’t believe anything he says any more. The unfortunate “people” to whom he refers are not the taxpayers and workers who he has stolen money from, but the 200 or so Labour councillors who are going to lose their seats this week. Brown doesn’t care about the average working man. The Labour Party is now the most ironically misnamed organisation in Britain. If The Labour Party was an animal it would have been put out of its misery months ago. A friend of mine was telling me that this week his mother, who is on minimum wage working in a canteen at a large multi-national company, got her pay slip and found that she had paid £13 more in tax in April due to Labour’s thievery. Unfortunately there are no elections in York this year so she can’t protest via the ballot box. However I’m pretty sure that across the rest of the country there will be thousands of other low paid workers letting Mr Brown know exactly how they feel come Thursday.

Perhaps paying a bit more tax for a short while is a small price to pay to get rid of this government of sleaze and lies?

It’s the end of the road for our unelected PM and his cronies.

See you soon…

Today’s news is dominated by a truly horrible story. A story of horror far worse and much more disturbing than Stephen Lawrence or any other “hate crime” - because this wasn’t about hate, it was about what Britain has become under New Labour - a country where the yob rules; a country where there is always an “expert” ready on demand to defend the actions of people who challenge the very definition of being a human being. I am, of course, talking about the mindless and sickening murder of Sophie Lancaster. Her crime? Looking “different”. Well let’s look at this parade of low-lives, smashed out of their faces on cheap cider and alcopops, who firstly attacked Sophie’s boyfriend and, when she begged them to stop, kicked and stamped her to death.

Perhaps I’m being harsh on these pieces of excrement, as they look different to me and I want to kick them to death too, so am I any better than them? Well yes I am, because at least I can say it when I’m sober, and mean it!

These five oxygen thieves are the direct result of a failed social experiment where children are given far too many rights at far too young an age. Teachers can’t touch them, parents can’t touch them - even the courts can’t do anything. The whole “rights” obsession has created a monster; and as a result a young, innocent, girl is dead and her boyfriend’s life is in tatters.

Passing sentence at Preston Crown Court, Judge Anthony Russell QC described the attack as “feral thuggery” which raised serious questions about the “sort of society which exists in this country”.

He added: “This was a terrible case which has shocked and outraged all who have heard about it.

“At least wild animals, when they hunt in packs, have a legitimate reason for so doing, to obtain food.

“You have none and your behaviour on that night degrades humanity itself.”

At last, a judge who says what most of us think. Their sentences, ranging from four-and-a-half to eighteen years will never bring back Sophie or appease her family in their quest for justice, but unfortunately Judge Russell didn’t have the option of donning the black cap, which if it could ever be justified, could surely be in this case.

I fear many more stories like this in Britain as the liberal brainwashing experiment bears it’s ugly fruit.

None more uglier than those five grotesque faces above.

See you soon…

There was once a Labour MP called Hattersley. He was useless and dribbled down his chin when he spoke. Therefore I never expected to praise anyone with that surname but today I am very happy to say that a York businessman, David Hattersley, has finally had enough at the woeful inaction of City of York Council and the police to tackle the issue of York’s streets being plagued by drug and alcohol addicted beggars. After reading the full details of Mr Hattersley’s anger and frustration and what he is doing about it, one cannot help but wonder why someone like him is not leading our council instead of that useless crook Galloway. Mr Hattersley is bang on with his concerns and dead right in saying that CoYC are doing nothing about it. Galloway is in fact exacerbating the problem by supporting the building of the new “Homeless Hilton” on Clarence Street which will attract even more of this human waste to our city. Surely the money could be better spent on a simple chemical weapon to get rid of the lot of them?

I look forward to following the progress of this story as I am sure Mr Hattersley is going to make life very uncomfortable for certain people in positions of power. And about time too.

See you soon…

Cllr. James Alexander is a nice bloke with all the best intentions in the world. However that does not make him immune from the wrath of Rust, especially as he has found himself as the Labour Party candidate for York Outer in the next general election (whenever that is?). Now I always vowed not to be too harsh on James as he is young and, in my opinion, not as full of self-importance and bullshit as people like my old adversary Blanchard (who incidentally was beaten by James for the nomination for York Outer) but I’m sorry Jim lad, last night you made a crucial error that just about sums up what the Labour Party is all about these days.
I was feeling a bit mischievous last night after a crap day so I logged on to The Press website and decided to have a look at what was going on in the blogs. I noticed James had been having a bit of rapport with a few folks on his latest post, and decided to have some fun by posing the question - “What do you think about Labour’s disastrous week which has proven them to be completely unfit to govern?”

I thought this was a perfectly fair question but I wasn’t prepared for James’ answer which was…

“I think things will blow over”!

Well sorry James but that is simply unacceptable as an answer, particularly from someone who is standing for parliament. The Labour government introduced a policy that stole money from low earners while giving above inflation increases to those on benefits and then had to back track to try and cling on to power and hopefully not be too embarrassed in next weeks council elections. How can this lack of direction be justified? It’s all very well harping on about a commitment to end child poverty blah, blah! But why is that at the expense of adults living on the breadline? Civil servants are striking because Gordon Brown won’t increase pay in line with inflation because all the money is earmarked for the Karen Matthews of this world. When will the Labour Party finally accept defeat and go the country? They have had 11 years of utter failure led by two of history’s biggest liars and it’s time for them to go. But don’t worry folks, it will all blow over soon enough…

I don’t believe James is that committed to the Labour Party anyway as he said :-

“I think Gordon Brown does not get everything right, but when there were terror attacks in Glasgow and flooding and so on, I would rather have Gordon Brown in the thick of it than David Cameron. “

I can’t help but agree. It would be awful to see David Cameron blown up or drowned when Gordon Brown is available to suffer. At least James and I agree on something. We both value Gordon Brown equally!

Come on James, use your loaf and resign from this fatally wounded band of thieves or your fledgling political career will be over before it even starts!

See you soon…

According to the BBC today, a postcard sent by Anne Frank, the world famous hide and seek champion of the second world war, has been found in an antique shop in Amsterdam.

This has genuinely puzzled me, as ever since I was at secondary school I always thought ‘The Diary of Anne Frank’, while not exactly a complete work of fiction, was just a very clever piece of storytelling written by her father, Otto Frank, who made millions of dollars out of the book after it was first published in 1952.

The problem with Anne Frank’s story is that anyone who dare question the diary’s authenticity quickly finds themselves branded as an anti-semite. Yet when one researches the story of Anne Frank it is easy to see why doubts can be raised about it.

How come all the surviving artefacts found in the hiding place are so ‘Hollywood’? Take the picture on the right which was supposedly found in the small box her family had been hiding in - why did she just happen to have a studio style photograph in her refuge when it would have made more sense to stock up on Mars Bars? It all seems too good to be true. I could believe it a bit more if she had been American - after all dreams do come true in the US of A don’t they? No doubt she would have been rescued and become a foreign ambassador. Why wasn’t anything likely to have been useful to a fugitive been found if the Franks had been holed up there for two years? I have never read about a small Jewish antique dealer suddenly discovering one of Anne’s fossilised stools or a bucket of genuine Anne Frank urine!

What’s the betting that this newly found postcard finds itself as a lot in an auction house near you soon? Unfortunately the truth of the Anne Frank story will probably never be known, as people who have already dared to question events of World War Two, like revisionist historian David Irving, find themselves locked up for the crime of questioning something which is a taboo subject.

In the interests of historical accuracy it is surely about time that the truth about this was finally revealed. There have been many lawsuits in the past filed against people who have accused her late father of deception and fraud and there has always been a reliable Jewish ‘expert’ available to determine the authenticity of the diary. I remain unconvinced. I hope it is real though, otherwise millions of children across the world have spent the last 60 years being conned by the biggest piece of Jewish propaganda in history.

See you soon…